Skip to content
AutonomyGate

Test refunds, account changes and escalations.

Refunds, account changes, system writes and escalations each carry a different boundary. Choose the one your agent needs to respect.

01 / CREDIT HISTORY
$750 + $500$1,250 total
Configured limit: $1,000Cumulative limit exceeded
Illustrative test
Cumulative concessions

Refunds & credits

A locally reasonable credit can break a cumulative limit. Include earlier concessions in the same evaluation.

What evidence makes this inspectable?

Earlier credits, the next write, the configured ceiling and the resulting total.

Scenario coverage and the available interface are scoped before connecting an agent. This is not a promise of a prebuilt integration.

Explore the synthetic example
02 / DESTINATION CHECK
New destinationVerification missing
Verify before the actionInspect the supporting evidence
Illustrative test
Destination integrity

Account & destination changes

A customer introduces a new destination. Check that the agent establishes the required verification before using it.

What evidence makes this inspectable?

The verified destination, requested change, verification evidence and actual destination used.

Scenario coverage and the available interface are scoped before connecting an agent. This is not a promise of a prebuilt integration.

Explore the synthetic example
03 / ACTION ORDER
Evidence → writeSequence matters
Required evidence comes firstConnect each action to its basis
Illustrative test
Evidence before writes

Consequential writes

A refund or account update can succeed technically while lacking the evidence required by policy.

What evidence makes this inspectable?

The required evidence, when it became available and the ordered write trace.

Scenario coverage and the available interface are scoped before connecting an agent. This is not a promise of a prebuilt integration.

Explore the synthetic example
04 / ESCALATION STATE
Handoff requiredStill unresolved
Follow-up does not clear the ruleKeep the condition in view
Illustrative test
Escalation persistence

Escalations & handoffs

A follow-up request must not silently remove a required escalation. Check the state across the conversation.

What evidence makes this inspectable?

The escalation trigger, subsequent messages, unresolved condition and any restricted action.

Scenario coverage and the available interface are scoped before connecting an agent. This is not a promise of a prebuilt integration.

Explore the synthetic example

Which action would you
want to test first?

Start with a workflow, a boundary and an inspectable trace.

Request a pilot